|
Title: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 03, 2012, 03:53:46 pm Howdy all
Here is a track I made today to test my settings. You will enjoy the kill I promise. Machine specs are Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Mobo MSI 890FXA-GD70 AM3+ http://www.msi.com/product/mb/890FXA-GD70.html (http://www.msi.com/product/mb/890FXA-GD70.html) Processor: AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor (4 CPUs), ~3.5GHz Memory: OCZ 4096MB RAM Page File: 5717MB used, 2471MB available GeForce GTX 660 Ti 3g FTW Display Memory: 711 MB Dedicated Memory: 3015 MB Shared Memory: 1791 MB Current Mode: 1600 x 1200 (32 bit) (60Hz) Still on CRT 19" Viewsonic Ultrabrite A90f+ Here is my results with my settings setup this way in game. No outside GPU influence. (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/T_O_A_D/Rise%20of%20Flight/test1.jpg) I'm start the benchmark at 3-5 seconds and end it a 2:27 roughly Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 3805, 146543, 22, 33, 25.965 Time Stamp 1:41 screen shot (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/T_O_A_D/Rise%20of%20Flight/maxedout.jpg) So far AA/AF in game works better for me than GPU outside of game does for IQ. I'll add more as I test. Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 03, 2012, 03:56:40 pm Hmm can't upload the track here its too big.
I guess email me for it until I find a place to host it. Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 03, 2012, 04:13:50 pm I was able to host it up over at the Dnagerdogz, but I'm not sure if you can get it there either without joining the forum.
http://dangerdogz.com/forums/topic/10381-rof-video-tweaking/ (http://dangerdogz.com/forums/topic/10381-rof-video-tweaking/) Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: GOZR on December 03, 2012, 04:36:08 pm You do not have permission to view this attachment.
Argh! Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: GOZR on December 03, 2012, 04:42:46 pm Toad would it be possible for you to try your RoF setting
Object visibility= 80% Forest= Very far and maybe reflection= High I think you will not see much difference but gain FPS Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 03, 2012, 04:55:48 pm yeh next test I'll try that.
Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 03, 2012, 05:16:44 pm Just tried your suggestion I gain just a bit
Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 3794, 142456, 21, 33, 26.633 Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 03, 2012, 05:30:55 pm I've adjusted to this level its as far as I'm willing to drop back I think.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/T_O_A_D/Rise%20of%20Flight/test-2.jpg) Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 4202, 144957, 25, 33, 28.988 I'll post a pic to compare in a bit. Timestamp 1:41 screen shot these settings (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/T_O_A_D/Rise%20of%20Flight/tweakeddown.jpg) Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: GOZR on December 03, 2012, 05:34:04 pm I do not dither.. ;|
Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: GOZR on December 03, 2012, 05:34:41 pm with a 8 cores you'll get easy double that or more :)
Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 03, 2012, 08:04:28 pm I put the CPU on Christmas list with several other things so till I know what I open up Christmas I'll hold off on the 8 core for sure. Till then this will have to do.
Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-Gunslinger on December 03, 2012, 08:27:23 pm ROF does not use 8 cores.
It only uses 3. Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 04, 2012, 12:00:23 am I've updated bios and enabled the latest OC tweaks for the MSI software.
It has my system optimized @ 3893mhz I just ran my track and Bench Marked in Fraps at Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 6390, 142830, 37, 62, 44.739 Big jump, so go outside and howl at the moon a bit Gozr. ;-) Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 04, 2012, 03:05:42 pm One of the Dangerdogz mentioned to click MultiGPU even though I don't have one because it helps Sure enough it did.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/T_O_A_D/Rise%20of%20Flight/test3.jpg) Frames, Time (ms), Min, Max, Avg 6783, 142872, 32, 75, 47.476 And I really can't tell any difference in what I actually see from Full switch, short more fps (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/T_O_A_D/multigpumonitorcalib.jpg) Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: GOZR on December 04, 2012, 03:18:07 pm Ho interesting ! Didn't know that :)
Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: GOZR on December 04, 2012, 03:22:09 pm New Nvidia driver out 310.70
Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 04, 2012, 10:01:02 pm Pics of Sweetfx on a CRT to compare, Not impressed as of yet.
Normal off (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/T_O_A_D/Rise%20of%20Flight/NoSweetFX.jpg) With it on (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/T_O_A_D/Rise%20of%20Flight/SweetFXon.jpg) Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: GOZR on December 04, 2012, 10:35:03 pm Something to do with Dither
Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-EcoDragon on December 11, 2012, 01:51:54 pm Yeah, it looks like AF is lower, and the trees settings look lower in the second shot as well...
Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: GOZR on December 11, 2012, 04:20:07 pm Yes the second shot must be the original..
Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-TOAD on December 11, 2012, 05:58:04 pm No the second picture is with it on.
I think my 660 is doing well enough job its not worth messing with. I'll post one after bit with HDR on too. Title: Re: ROF video testing Post by: TX-EcoDragon on December 19, 2012, 03:13:28 pm Dither is funny.....if you don't use Supersampling then dither lowers image quality some, but if you do use SuperSampling it increases it!
For me, I use dither with SuperSampling, 2XAA and Bilinear AF, and HDR Medium (to make it more lifelike/less cartoon color saturation) |