|
|
|
TX-Gunslinger
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: September 14, 2009, 06:51:02 pm » |
|
Don't shoot me but,
I selected two obvious and a third that folks might not agree with:
1) Jump in Jump-out 2) Better server host controls
and.....
3) MMO - yes I know that the bandwidth requirements of ROF if really extrapolated to MMO would shut down the World Wide Web as we know it - but I believe that development along these lines would probably provide a more efficient netcode.
I was tempted to select multi-player aircraft - however, even with that option in Il2 - I can say that I really never used it much. Perhaps .00005% of my flying time.
S~
Gunny
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Black 2 TX Flight Leader
|
|
|
|
GOZR
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: September 14, 2009, 07:46:40 pm » |
|
1]Jump in/jump out play 2]Better server/host controls 3]Multi-person flyable planes
Totally do not care for "In-game microphone support" What is MMO type servers ?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TX-Gunslinger
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: September 14, 2009, 08:08:52 pm » |
|
Don't you ever watch " Southpark" ?
Massively Multipayer Onlinegames... World of Warcraft You know - 10's of thousands of players - "alternate universe"......... Of course, ROF has such tiny bandwidth requirements - it's perfectly suited to this... S~ Gunny
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: September 14, 2009, 08:17:33 pm by TX-Gunslinger »
|
Logged
|
Black 2 TX Flight Leader
|
|
|
|
GOZR
Guest
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: September 14, 2009, 08:34:21 pm » |
|
LOL.. ok 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TX-Gunslinger
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: September 14, 2009, 09:35:55 pm » |
|
Thought you might like a laugh, Gozr  S~ Gunny
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Black 2 TX Flight Leader
|
|
|
|
TX-Kingsnake
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: September 14, 2009, 10:31:16 pm » |
|
1) Jump in Jump-out 2) Better server host controls
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
TX-Kingsnake 
|
|
|
|
TX-TOAD
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2009, 10:24:58 am » |
|
Jump in/jump out play
Improved UI
Multi-person flyable planes, I love this for training, I've long for this for years.
I thought about the Hot thing, but I've never done it so I'm not sure how bad or good it is.
In-game microphone support I'd pick this if we had tracks. It's also a very good tool, and it's a great shortcut for the Pilot when making training tracks. No need for video skills, just pilot, and the ability to speak, and record at the same time. I do it in IL2 for JO studies and homework. It keeps my track mine, No one is able to remove the voice and my skin and turn it in as theirs.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TX-Thunderbolt
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2009, 02:38:13 pm » |
|
Well, the poll ran for 24 hours and got 115 votes. 1/3 of all posters/voters want jump in/jump out ability. Like I said in the beta forum, I'm not surprised. How many people don't even make it to the forums and if they do can't/don't find their particular thread-of-interest.
The consensus number is higher than 1/3 I'd wager, but that's still respectable. This subject has gone from unspeakeable, to listed in a wishlist, to beta and public discussion and hopefully now to fast-track development.
I guess time will tell. Hopefully only a short period of time.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|